PORT <port-peer-review>
Summary? (6821)
Describes experiment to combine tools to create conceptual clusters of e-mail archives (6825)
Clusters evaluated and refined manually (6835)
Refined clusters may be used as input for another phase of automated clustering (6841)
Background info? (6931)
Uta Priss's work distinguishing associative and formal structures (6936)
"associative structures"? (6947)
Fuzzy (6956)
Probabilistic (6960)
Bottom-up (6964)
Complex (6968)
Depend on local context (6972)
Examples? (6997)
Latent Semantic Indexing (7003)
"formal structures"? (6951)
Hypothesis? (7021)
Knowledge representation should combine both, because human reasoning uses both (7027)
cdent's approach to augmentation? (7681)
Attempt at combining associative and formal structures (7038)
Faceted knowledge organization as their formal representation (7045)
Important contribution to PORT (7053)
General comments? (6564)
Description too general (6568)
Terms used without precision, definitions, or examples (6574)
Author agrees (7089)
Excuse? (7095)
Limited time (7100)
Deadlines more flexible than thought (7108)
Figures not helpful (6582)
Do not show term/concept/facet (6586)
No term/concept/facet determined at that stage (7119)
Nature of relations between nodes not explicit (6591)
No references to use of Formal Concept Analysis (6634)
Human evaluation process needs to be more explicit (8063)
Stress augmentation metamodel (8070)
Figures print badly (8078)
Specific comments (8118)
Potential utility of each method will emerge from side-by-side analysis (8090)
How to envision this? (8099)
Criteria for comparing utility? (8103)
"We built a testbed for evaluating tools." (8125)
Isn't method about organizing knowledge, not evaluating tools? (8131)
"extraction of recommended resources" (8145)
What kind of resources and extraction? (8151)
From where and to what purpose? (8156)
Traversal function will help evaluators attribute facets to messages (8163)
How is traversal function used/integrated in attribution process? (8172)
Do you have experience w/ coding practices? (8195)
Types of coding other than for importance? (8199)
Sources of coding terms? (8203)
How resolve coding conflicts? (8207)
Paper's hypothesis? (6646)
Classic document indexing techniques can generate meaningful clusters of data (6656)
Paper does not support this (6664)
Does not produce precise answers to precise questions (6671)
Valid? (7255)
Depends on your goals (7270)
Goals? (7276)
Find precise answer to precise question (7261)
Learn generally, without precise goals (7284)
Classic indexing better for precise questions (7300)
True statement of authors' hypothesis? (7129)
Not according to cdent (7134)
cdent: Project is effort to create tools to augment process of faceted classification (7150)
Poorly worded in abstract (7166)
What tools are used? (6598)
Classic document indexing tool (6609)
Does not produce anything "conceptual" to exploit (6616)
Different/original from other indexing tools? (6624)
Tool in progress (7060)
Accept any input indicating clustering of documents (7066)
Support evaluating and labelling clusters (7077)
Relevance to PORT? (7227)
PORT's purpose is to evaluate tools that may be useful (7231)
Authors' tool is for evaluating tools (7248)
Thought about extending work to use conceptual ontologies rather than terms? (8239)
What happens after humans have manually labelled terms? (8245)
Do discovered relations become available for automated processing in next analysis? (8250)