PORT <port-peer-review@bootstrap.org>
Summary? (7590)
Less knowledge-oriented version of WebKB may be required for PORT (7594)
Examples? (7603)
Concept maps (7608)
Labelled links do not genuinely represent actual relationships (7627)
Not a knowledge representation language (7743)
Implications? (7789)
Hard to check (7795)
No inferencing (7800)
Why not? (7750)
Not required to declare and organize set of labels (7762)
No quantifiers (7769)
Why important? (7896)
Eliminate ambiguity (7903)
Do they have contexts? (7822)
Formal structures use abstract, global contexts (7833)
Associative structures use local contexts (7840)
Do they have sets? (7827)
Valid? (7806)
Not a formal representation, but an associative one (7813)
How can they be integrated with formal structures? (7848)
More problems than even natural languages (7861)
Constraints? (7869)
Concept nodes must have known quantifier with explicit scope (7877)
Relation types must be declared and have known signature (7886)
General comments? (7478)
Martin represents divergent view from La Barre/Dent (7482)
Formal approach impedes collaboration (7508)
Ref to need for "precise, flexible" approach (7514)
Collaboration would benefit from more precision (7620)
WebKB interesting way of representing knowledge (7520)
Method for creating WebKB encodings? (7488)
Manual construction of formalisms (7543)
Connecting statements most difficult step for users (7494)
Difficult for user (7553)
Valid? (7560)
For most representations, formalisms are not an obstacle (7566)
Some representations are difficult (7575)