PORT <port-peer-review@bootstrap.org>
How to manage review process for 2002 workshop submissions? (3542)
Convert submitted papers into HTML with purple numbers (3551)
Discuss papers on port-peer-review@bootstrap.org (3556)
Use purple numbers to reference paragraphs in papers (3660)
Dialog map mailing list discussion daily (3562)
Submissions? (3575)
How WebKB Could Contribute to PORT (3580)
"How WebKB Could Contribute to PORT" review (6557)
La Barre/Dent review Martin (6380)
On the Practical Bearings of Peirce's Maxim (3586)
"On the Practical Bearings of Peirce's Maxim" review (3671)
Martin reviews Sarbo (6384)
Martin feels unqualified to review Sarbo (6487)
Creating Conceptual Access (3622)
"Creating Conceptual Access" review (6535)
DeMoor reviews La Barre/Dent (6376)
Making Doug's Dream Come True (3627)
"Making Doug's Dream Come True" review (6541)
Sarbo reviews DeMoor (6388)
Review assignments? (6371)
La Barre/Dent review Martin (6380)
Martin reviews Sarbo (6384)
Martin feels unqualified to review Sarbo (6487)
DeMoor reviews La Barre/Dent (6376)
Sarbo reviews DeMoor (6388)
Relations between submissions? (8041)
Martin represents divergent view from La Barre/Dent (7482)
Each paper like a blind man describing different parts of an elephant (8053)
Inefficiencies in review process? (6310)
Technology (6314)
Textual errors make interpretation inefficient (6338)
How can we improve the process? (6321)
Individuals should be vigilant about correcting their own papers (6325)
Assign individuals papers to review publicly (6345)
Ensures every paper reviewed at least once (6509)
Encourages open process (6517)
Need an improvement process (6352)
Draw relations to other submitted papers (6358)
Authors should review everyone else's papers (6501)
Skip review process entirely (6427)
Small number of submissions (6434)
Workshop character of meeting (6438)
Can learn something from this process (6460)
Purpose of paper reviewing? (6448)
Helps make useful reports (6453)